How blockchain can clean up the voluntary carbon market
In the second in a series of articles looking at the carbon market, the authors explore how the use of blockchain technology could not only keep the voluntary carbon market honest and...
9 June 2021 • by James E. Henderson in Leading in turbulent times
The once popular model of having a high-level management team develop a strategy which is then communicated to the rest of the organization is quickly becoming archaic. A truly inclusive strategy is...
Before one can strive for inclusiveness, it is important to understand what engagement looks like. “Participating means just asking for information but engagement means actually eliciting opinions on the critical choices facing the organization and including them in the whole process,” explains IMD Strategy Professor James Henderson.
But this level of inclusion has certain risks which mean even as companies transform their strategy process, there are a lot of fears and hesitations experienced by top executives. In Henderson’s webinar session he asked participants if they were an incoming CEO and presented with a new strategy from a team that had worked for a year but was only developed with high levels of input, how they would proceed. 57% said they would seek input from a wider cross-section of employees but still a limited contingent of critical stakeholders.
Some of the fears surrounding full inclusion include not wanting to slow down the process, worry that it will create expectations that if not met could actually cause employee disengagement and disappointment, and concern that it could even backfire by exposing a majority bias which alienates some part of the employee population.
However, done correctly, the benefits of full inclusion outweigh these fears.
Looking at the case study of Roche Diagnostics, CPS, which faced this dilemma, Henderson demonstrated what it looks like to strive for full inclusion in the strategy process.
Roche’s leadership team had spent a year looking at possible strategy choices and formulated a plan. Then the company’s incoming CEO, Thomas Schinecker, noticed that the budget might not support the number of projects planned, so he opted to seek organizational wide input before moving forward. Under Schinecker, all employees were invited to participate in strategy workshops, with roughly 50% actually engaging in the process. Using heavy touch digital tracking 11,300 ideas were collected, consolidated, and reported back to the leadership team.
The level of employee engagement was so high at Roche, they continued to repeat this exercise at broader levels. Schinecker says the key for executives is to let go. “If you have faith in the power of the people, they will come up with something brilliant,” he encouraged.
Furthermore, the results gave the strategy team a lot of granularity in terms of their choices. The company’s head of strategy indicated that people didn’t seem to mind how their inputs were used but they were excited about being part of the process. There is a lot of research to indicate this is a common phenomenon: if people feel the process was fair, they are satisfied with the results. So, despite the risks, it is worth the effort to include everyone.
Professor of Strategic Management at IMD
James E. Henderson is Professor of Strategic Management at IMD, Program Co-Director of the Leading Sustainable Business Transformation program, and Program Director of the Strategic Partnership course. He helps companies achieve and sustain their competitive advantage either at a business unit, corporate, or global level through directing custom specific executive programs, facilitating strategy workshops, or teaching MBAs and executives.
6 September 2023 • by Karl Schmedders, Jerome Cochet, Ricarda Röller, Angelika Schmid, Philipp Müller in Sustainability • 6 min read
In the second in a series of articles looking at the carbon market, the authors explore how the use of blockchain technology could not only keep the voluntary carbon market honest and...
22 August 2023 • by Jim Pulcrano in Sustainability • 3 min read
With investors increasingly focusing on ESG topics, you might think that being a Tech for Good company would help attract funding. This is not always the case, says Marc Gitzinger, CEO of...
22 August 2023 • by Jim Pulcrano in Sustainability • 4 min read
Frustrated by the limitations of using technology to do good in the non-profit sector, Lotta Relander decided to found Grownate, a digital platform that helps corporates and brands connect with their customers...
21 August 2023 • by Karl Schmedders in Sustainability • 6 min read
As the world enters a new era of “global boiling”, how can businesses mitigate the economic and operational challenges posed by increasingly severe and frequent extreme weather events? ...
16 August 2023 • by Calimna Sladic in Sustainability • 8 min read
Growing up in the sunny south of France, I had the chance to be in nature pretty much every day. Access to nature was normal to me. The experiences of one of...
4 August 2023 • by Florian Hoos in Sustainability • 6 min read
The world needs to watch the EU’s directive on sustainability reporting – even if you think it won’t apply to you. Here are five tips for handling it strategically. ...
13 July 2023 • by Frédéric Dalsace in Sustainability • 6 min read
Marketing often gets a bad rap due to its association with the excesses of capitalism, but it can play an important role in driving more sustainable business practices and consumption patterns, says...
4 July 2023 • by Vanina Farber in Sustainability • 9 min read
Are you neglecting the ‘S’ in your ESG strategy? Progress on social issues has lagged behind the more clearly defined environmental and governance concerns. However, a combination of changing consumer preferences, employee...
Explore first person business intelligence from top minds curated for a global executive audience